##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Conventional concrete aggregate consists of sand (fine aggregate) and various sizes and shapes of gravel or stones (coarse aggregate). However, there is a growing interest in substituting alternative aggregate materials, largely as a potential use for recycled materials. While there is significant research on many different materials for aggregate substitutes such as granulated coal ash, blast furnace slag or various solid wastes including fiberglass waste materials, granulated plastics, paper and wood products or wastes, sintered sludge pellets and others. Recycled waste glasses were used as coarse and fine aggregates replacement in concrete.  Coarse aggregates were replaced with Green Bottles coarse aggregates at third, half, two thirds, and 100% replacement ratios. The replacement of a third coarse aggregate was established as being the most suitable for retaining the properties of the concrete mix design. As for fine aggregates, in order to account for the numbers of variables and clearly establish a bench mark, the sand grading, color of glass, source of waste glass (bottles and non-bottles), and design mix strength were used as parameters. Fine aggregates from green, brown, and transparent bottles in addition to clear window waste glass were used. Concrete properties were tested in fresh and hardened states. The incorporation of glass sand regardless of the ratios of replacement showed no significant influence on fresh or mechanical properties of concrete except for the case of transparent bottles. Transparent bottles due to the wide source of obtainability have introduced a non-uniform factor that caused discrepancy compared to the rest of the group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Shao, Y., Lefort, T., Moras, S., and Rodriguez, D. “Studies on Concrete Containing Ground Waste Glass”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 30, 2000, pp 91-100.
     Google Scholar
  2. Byars, E.A., Zhu H.Y., and Morales, B., “Conglasscrete I”, www.wrap.org.uk.
     Google Scholar
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, “Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States Tables and Figures for 2010,” 2011, 58 pp.
     Google Scholar
  4. The Waste Resource Action Program, “Recycled Glass Market Study & Standard Review - 2003 Update”, www.wrap.org.uk.
     Google Scholar
  5. Tan, K. H., and Du, H., “Towards a Sustainable Concrete: ‘Sandless’ Concrete,” Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, V. 18, No. 1-2, 2011, pp. 99-107.
     Google Scholar
  6. Tan, K. H., and Du, H., “Sandless Concrete with Fly Ash as Supplementary Cementing Material,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, V. 2, No. 3-4, pp. 238-249.
     Google Scholar
  7. Frank, P., and Nichols, J., “Manufactured Sand and Crushed Stone in Portland Cement Concrete,” Concrete International, V. 4, No. 8, Aug. 1982, pp. 56-63.
     Google Scholar
  8. Siddique, R., “Effect of Fine Aggregate Replacement with Class F Fly Ash on the Abrasion Resistance of Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1877-1881.
     Google Scholar
  9. Meyer, C., “The Greening of the Concrete Industry,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 31, No. l 8, 2009, pp. 601-605.
     Google Scholar
  10. Shi, C., and Zheng, K., “A Review on the Use of Waste Glasses in the Production of Cement and Concrete,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V. 52, No. 2, 2007, pp. 234-247.
     Google Scholar
  11. Meyer, C., and Xi, Y., “Use of Recycled Glass and Fly Ash for Precast Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, V. 11, No. 2, 1999, pp. 89-90.
     Google Scholar
  12. Polley, C.; Cramer, S. M.; and Cruz, R. V., “Potential for Using Waste Glass in Portland Cement Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, V. 10, No. 4, 1998, pp. 210-219
     Google Scholar
  13. Shayan, A., and Xu, A., “Value-Added Utilization of Waste Glass in Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 5, 2004, pp. 81-89.
     Google Scholar
  14. Berry, M.; Stephens, J.; and Cross, D., “Performance of 100% Fly Ash Concrete with Recycled Glass Aggregate,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 4, July-Aug. 2011, pp. 378-384.
     Google Scholar
  15. Shao, Y.; Lefort, T.; Moras, S.; and Rodriguez, D., “Studies on Concrete Containing Ground Waste Glass”, Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 1, 2000, pp. 91-100.
     Google Scholar
  16. Karamberi, A., and Moutsatsou, A., “Participation of Coloured Glass Cullet in Cementitious Materials,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 27, No. 2, 2005, pp. 319-327.
     Google Scholar
  17. Park, S. B.; Lee, B. C.; and Kim, J. H., “Studies on Mechanical Properties of Concrete Containing Waste Glass Aggregate,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 12, 2004, pp. 2181-2189.
     Google Scholar
  18. Topcu, I. B., and Canbaz, M., “Properties of Concrete Containing Waste Glass,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 2, 2004, pp. 267-274.
     Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, C. and Baxter, S., “Use of Recycled Glass for Concrete Masonry Blocks”, Final Report 97-15, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY, November 1997.
     Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, C. and Baxter, S., “Use of Recycled Glass and Fly Ash for Precast Concrete”, Final Report 98-18, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY, October 1998.
     Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, C., “Development of Glass Concrete Products”, Final Report to Office of Recycling Market Development, New York State Department of Economic Development, Albany, NY, March 1999.
     Google Scholar
  22. Jin, W., “Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete with Glass Aggregates – A Chemo-Physico-Mechanical Approach”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  23. Jin, W., Meyer, C. and Baxter, S., "Glascrete – Concrete with Glass Aggregate”, ACI Materials Journal, March-April 2000.
     Google Scholar
  24. ASTM C469, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2002, 5 pp.
     Google Scholar
  25. ASTM C 136, "Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates," ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2002, 5 pp.
     Google Scholar
  26. ASTM C33, “Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, 11 pp.
     Google Scholar
  27. ASTM C78, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2002, 3 pp
     Google Scholar
  28. ASTM C 496/C496M, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004, 5 pp.
     Google Scholar
  29. ASTM C 143/C143M, “Standard Test Method for Sump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005, 4 pp.
     Google Scholar