##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The research work is on determination of optimum dosage of soda ash and lime in treating underground water in Makurdi metropolis. In carrying out the work, samples of borehole and well water from five different locations of the study area were analyzed to ascertain the level of hardness and subsequently, determine the optimum values of soda ash (Na2CO3) and lime (Ca(OH)2) that will reduce the water hardness. The locations were, North Bank, Wurukum, Wadata, High Level and Kanshio. The raw water hardness level range from 80mg/l to 200mg/l averagely, which is above WHO (2005) drinking water standards of 75mg/l to 100mg/l. After treatment, the pH was found to range between 6.8 - 7.8, while the hardness obtained ranged from 76mg/l to 100mg/l and 20mg/l to 80mg/l for borehole and well water respectively, which is slightly within the WHO (2005) standard.  The optimal dosage of Na2CO3 and Ca (OH)2 were determined to be 2.4 ml each with a positive correlation of 0.90. It is recommended that, soda ash be used for the treatment of underground water hardness for safe drinking, while lime be used for other domestic purposes for cost effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Agber, T. (2003): Assessment of Ground Water Quality in urban Area of Nigeria, (A case study of Makurdi town in Benue State).PP 23-25.
     Google Scholar
  2. Agunwamba, J.C. (2000.) Optimal maintenance of rural boreholes schemes Nigerian J. of Eng. Mgmt. 1(2), 13-22.
     Google Scholar
  3. APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1998). Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed., Washington, D.C.
     Google Scholar
  4. Amber, W.E. (1999), Engineering Hydrology Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  5. BERWASSA : Benue Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency,Makurdi.
     Google Scholar
  6. Crachley and Jones, G.D. (1968), An Interpretation of the Geology and Gravity linements iraq.iraqi J. Sci.33(1-2):63-65.
     Google Scholar
  7. Fair, J.K, Overman M. and Apha, G.O. (1971), Water Pollution and Management. Widely Eastern Ltd New Delhi, PP 36-50.
     Google Scholar
  8. Jones, J.R. and M.F. Knowlton. (2005). Chlorophii response to nutrients and non-algal seston in Missouri reservoirs and oxbow lakes. Lake Reserv.Manage. 21:361-370.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kathleen, P.T. (1999), Waste Water Treatment Technology ANN ARBOR Science Publisher Inc. Michigan U.S.A, PP. 33-34.
     Google Scholar
  10. Nikoladze G.; Mintis, D.; Kastalsky, A. (1988) Water Treatment for Public and Industrial supply (English ed.) MIR Publ., Moscow. WHO, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  11. Nikoladze, G., Mints D and Kastalkya, A. (1988) Water Treatment for public and industrial supply: MIR publisher Moscow print. USSR. PP 9 – 29.
     Google Scholar
  12. Parrott.(1999),Household water-Quality-Water Hardness. Retrieved 2001-01-20,PP 11887-278091.
     Google Scholar
  13. Priscall F. (1986), Water “Treatment” Mir Publishers Moscow.
     Google Scholar
  14. Ray, E.C., Waltrip, S.C. Saxena MM (1988), Environmental Analysis Water Soil and Air.”Environ.Sci.Technol.36,PP 2067-2070.
     Google Scholar
  15. Reyment, R.A. (1965). Aspect of the Geology of Nigeria Ibadan University press.
     Google Scholar
  16. WHO, 2005. Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater in agriculture 2nd Edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
     Google Scholar
  17. Wishart, S.J, Lumberts, S.P and Griffith (1990), Export system for the Interpretation of river quality data.”Water International,Vol.10,PP 32-34.
     Google Scholar
  18. Water Review, Consumer report, (1990). A publication of the water quality research council, Vol. 5,No 1.
     Google Scholar