Risk and Uncertainty in the Medan-Binjai Toll Road Infrastructure Project, Indonesia Based on the Stochastic Analyzes



Abstract Views
682

Downloads
671

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted May 27, 2018
Published Jun 30, 2018
10.24018/ejeng.2018.3.6.769

Abstract viewed = 682 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper demonstrates state of the arts stochastic risk analyzes in assisting decision-making processes in achieving the project objectives in terms of the estimating project costs under uncertainty. The objectives of this study were to; (i) analyze the feasibility of the Trans Sumatra toll road projects section of Medan-Binjai (25.46 km), Indonesia, and (ii) identify and quantify the toll road risk and uncertainty variables influencing the economic feasibility of the project using stochastic approach. This study identified that the risk variables in this study may include; Indonesia Certificate Bank (SBI), inflation, volume of traffic (vehicles), operation and maintenance (O&M) costs, construction costs, land accusation costs, Jakarta Inter-Bank Offer Rate (JIBOR), and design (EED/FED). The initial results of this study (Scenario 1), using concession period of a-35 years with an implementation of the initial tariff of class I vehicles (Rp. 750 / km) showed that the project was considered not financially feasible as 90% probability of the projected net present value (NPV) was negative at the range of Rp. -1.06 trillion to Rp. 2.57 trillion. The project would be financially feasibility after conducting mitigation processes for those the identified risks, such as; providing the government supports (GSs) as much as 40% of the total construction costs as well as land acquisition costs (Scenario 3). This scenario has resulted that there was 90% probability of the projected NPV would be positive at the range of Rp. 0.54 million to 1.894 million. The implementation of the stochastic risk analysis may assist the project managers comprehensively in developing decision-making processes in financing the toll road project.

Keywords: Risks Uncertainty Stochastic NPV Government Support Construction Costs Toll Road

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. S. Iqbal, R.M. Choudhry, K. Holschemacher, A. Ali, J. Tamošaitienė, Risk management in construction projects, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 21, 2015, 65–78. doi:10.384
     Google Scholar
  2. Hadi Setiawan dan Eko Nur Setiawan, 2015, Financial Model (Model Keuangan Dana Dukungan Kelayakan) Studi Kasus Proyek Jalan Tol Palembang-Indralaya, Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan (KEK), Volume 19 Nomor 3: 204-217.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bambang, S dan Muhamad, AB., 2012, Financial Policy Transportation Infrastructure Development based on Public Sector Partnership (Perkembangan Kebijakan Pembiayaan Infrastruktur Transportasi Berbasis Kerjasama Pemerintah Swasta) Di Indonesia, Jurnal Transportasi Volume 12 Nomor 2: 93-102.
     Google Scholar
  4. Andrea I. Niculescu, Bimlesh Wadhwa, Evan Quek, Smart City Technologies: Design and Evaluation of an Intelligent Driving Assistant for Smart Parking, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology (IJASEIT), Vol.6 (2016) No. 6 ISSN: 2088-5334 1096-1102.
     Google Scholar
  5. Sandhyavitri, Ari, Water Supply: Five Major Elements for Sustainability of Urban Water Supply Projects, 2010, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Germany, ISBN 3843361193 (ISBN13: 9783843361194), pp 129-138.
     Google Scholar
  6. Raftery. J., 1986, Risk Analysis in Project Management, E & F Spon, London.
     Google Scholar
  7. Svetlozar T. Rachev, Stoyan V. Stoyanov and Frank J. Fabozzi, 2011, A Probability Metrics Approach to Financial Risk Measures, Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN: 978-1-4051-8369-7, pp 146-190.
     Google Scholar
  8. Smith, N. J., (Editor), Managing Risk in Construction Project, Blackwell Science, London, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  9. A.M. Khan, Risk factors in toll road life cycle analysis, Transp. A Transp. Sci. 9 (2013) 408–428. doi:10.1080/18128602.2011.587134.
     Google Scholar
  10. J.L. Nicolini-Llosa, Toll Road Concessions in Argentina: What Can Be Learned, Transp. Res. Rec. 1812, 2002, 10–21. doi:10.3141/1812-02.
     Google Scholar
  11. Svetlozar T. Rachev, Stoyan V. Stoyanov and Frank J. Fabozzi, A Probability Metrics Approach to Financial Risk Measures, Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, ISBN: 978-1-4051-8369-7, pp 146-190.
     Google Scholar
  12. Andreas Wibowo, 2005-a, A Stochastic and Deterministic Approach for Studying Infrastructure Investment Project (Pendekatan Stokastik dan Deterministik Dalam Kajian Investasi Proyek Infrastruktur), Prosiding 25 Tahun Pendidikan MRK di Indonesia, 18-19 Agustus 2005, Departemen Teknik Sipil, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
     Google Scholar
  13. Andreas Wibowo, 2005-b, Risk Management in Toll Road Industry Financed with the Private Sector in Indonesia (Manajemen Risiko Dalam Industri Jalan Tol Yang Didanai Oleh Sektor Swasta di Indonesia), Prosiding 25 Tahun Pendidikan MRK di Indonesia, 18-19 Agustus 2005, Departemen Teknik Sipil, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
     Google Scholar
  14. Andreas Wibowo,2005-c, Estimating General Threshold Traffic Levels of Typical Build, Operate, and Transfer Toll Road Projects in Indonesia, Journal of Construction Management and Economics, (2005) 23, 1-10.
     Google Scholar
  15. Andreas Wibowo, dan Kochendörfer, B., 2005, Financial Risk Analysis of Project Finance in the Indonesian Toll Roads, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 131, No. 9, 963-973.
     Google Scholar
  16. Abednego, M.P., and Ogunlana, S.O., 2006, Good Project Governance for Proper Risk Allocation In Public–Private Partnerships In Indonesia, International Journal of Project Management, 24 (7), 622–634.
     Google Scholar
  17. Fatin Ellisya Sapri, Nur Shuhada Nordin, Siti Maisarah Hasan, Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob, Syerina Azlin Md Nasir, Decision Tree Model for Non-Fatal Road Accident Injury, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 7 (2017) No. 1, pages: 63-70, DOI:10.18517/ijaseit.7.1.11106/20294913.2014.994582.
     Google Scholar
  18. A. Sandhyavitri, N. Saputra, Risk Analyzes of Tol Road at Pre Construction Phase (Analisis Risiko Jalan Tol tahap Pra konstruksi) Studi Kasus Jalan Tol Pekanbaru-Dumai), 2015.
     Google Scholar
  19. Ari Sandhyavitri, Zamri, Sugeng Wiyono, Subiantoro, Three Strategies Reducing Accident Rates at Black Spots and BlackSites Road in Riau Province, Indonesia,Transportation Research Procedia ScienceDirect, 2352-1465, Published by Elsevier B.V, 2017 pp. 2153-2166.
     Google Scholar
  20. Regulation of the Presiden Republik Indonesia Number 117 year 2015 (Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 117 Tahun 2015, Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 100 Tahun 2014) concerning acceleration of toll road development in Sumatra (Percepatan Pembangunan Jalan Tol Di Sumatera).
     Google Scholar
  21. Highway Capacity Manual (Manual KapasitasJalan Indonesia (MKJI)), 1998, DirektoratJenderalBinaMarga, DepartemenPekerjaanUmumRepublik Indonesia, Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Public Work and Housings, 2015, Feasibility Study on Toll Road 1st Phase inBakauheni-Palembang and Dumai-TebingTinggi (Sumatera), Final Report, DONG IL Engineering ConsultantsD O N G N A M E & C.
     Google Scholar
  23. P. Corporation, Guide to Using Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-In for Microsoft ® Excel, New York, USA, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  24. Public Work, 2015b. High grade Highway Development Planning (Rencana Pembangunan High Grade Highway Sumatera), PU-net, http://www.pu.go.id/berita/7337/ rencana-pembanguan-high-grade-highway-sumatra, diakses pada 7 November 2015.
     Google Scholar
  25. Public Work, 2015. Trans Toll road of Sumatra (Tol Trans Sumatera Segera Dibangun), in http://pu.go.id/main/view_pdf/8314, 7 November 2015.
     Google Scholar
  26. BI Rate, Laporan Inflasi (Indeks Harga Konsumen), dan Jakarta Inter-Bank Offer Rate (JIBOR), http://www.bi.go.id/web/id/Moneter/ BI+ Rate/Data+BI+Rate/ diakses pada 12 Maret 2016.
     Google Scholar
  27. Pertmaster, Project Risk Management Procedures, Description. (2003). papers2://publication/uuid/D5E52260-BE2B-4C6F-9471-8ABCB7A95B8E.
     Google Scholar