##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The fight against contemporary terrorism involves variety of situations in which terrorists are mixed with or are in immediate vicinity to the citizens. Use of conventional weapons in such environment often results in high levels of unintended casualties and destruction. Non-lethal technologies, having reversible effects on people, equipment and infrastructure, can significantly contribute to prevention and countering terrorist actions while minimizing collateral damage. The article is an attempt to present in a synthesized brief form the results of a several-years study on the current and potential applications of non-lethal means in the terrorist threats defense and counteraction. The capabilities of both non-lethal weapons used for decades as well as some modern solutions and emerging technologies for protection of infrastructural sites and valuable assets and in counter-terrorism operations have been considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Physical protection of Critical Infrastructure Against Terrorist Attacks, Report of UN Security Council, Counter-Terrorism Executive Directorate, March 2017.
     Google Scholar
  2. C. Skinner, S. Cochrane, M. Field, and R. Johnston, “Defence Against Terrorism: The Evolution of Military Surveillance Systems into Effective Counter Terrorism Systems Suitable for Use in Combined Military Civil Environments. Dream or Reality?”, NATO report RTO-MP-SCI-158, UK, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  3. A. Spencer, “Questioning the Concept of ‘New Terrorism’”, Peace Conflict & Development, Issue 8, pp 1-33, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  4. R. Howard, and R. Sawyer. Terrorism and Counter-terrorist: Understanding the New Security Environment. USA: McGraw-Hill/ Dushkin, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  5. NATO’s Defence Against Terrorism Program, Available: https:// www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2014_10/ 20151029_ 141007-dat-prog.pdf
     Google Scholar
  6. V. Nikolova, Special Means for Individual Protection: Means for Individual Protection in Sites of Critical Infrastructure, in Anti-Terrorist Activities and in Operations in Crisis Response, BG: IMSETHAC-BAS, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  7. I.G. Radulescu, “Terrorism and its Impact on Global Economy”, Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges, vol. V (LXVIII), No 2, pp 87-94, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  8. Technology Against Terrorism: Structuring Security, US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1992, Available: https://digital. library. unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc40029/m2/1/high_res_d/9235.pdf
     Google Scholar
  9. J. Carafano, “Small Boats, Big Worries: Thwarting Terrorist Attacks from the Sea”, The Heritage Foundation, June 2007, Available: https://www.heritage.org/homeland-security/report/small-boats-big-worries-thwar-ting-terrorist-attacks-the-sea
     Google Scholar
  10. O. Radu, G. Slamnoiu, and L. Zarnescu. “Harbor Protection against Terrorist Threats: Difficulties and Possible Solutions”, NATO Technical Report RTO-MP-SCI-180, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  11. K. Stoichev, A. Popov, and N. Lichkov. Technologies and systems for combating terrorism, BG: IMSETHAC-BAS, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  12. S. Vodenicharov, D. Bratanov, R. Michailova, K. Stoychev, and V. Najdenov. “Underwater Hull Observation system ARMUS”. Proc. 15th International Scientific Congress “Machines, Technologies, Materials”, pp 319-322, Bulgaria, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  13. R. I. Sikandar, “Analysis of Protection Measures for Naval Vessels Berthed at Harbor against Terrorist Attacks”, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  14. An Assessment of Non-Lethal Weapons Science and Technology, Naval Studies Board, Executive summary, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  15. M. Annati, “The Role of Non-Lethal Weapons in Maritime Operations”, Maritime Interdiction Operations Journal, issue 9, pp 38-41, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  16. J. Alexander, “Piracy: The Best Business Model Available”, JSOU Report 13-7, USA, 2013, Available: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/ fulltext/ u2/a591812.pdf
     Google Scholar
  17. C. Brewer, “Maritime Security & Counter-Piracy: Strategic Adapta-tions and Technological Options”, Journal of Energy Security, April 2009, Available: http://www.ensec.org/index.php?option=com_ content&view=article&id=188: maritime-security-aamp…
     Google Scholar
  18. Studies Combined: Cyber Warfare in Cyberspace - National Defense, Workforce and Legal Issues, USA: J. F. Jones, January 2018.
     Google Scholar
  19. S. Sonsalla, “Non-Lethal Weapons: The Key to a More Aggressive Strategy to Combat Terrorism”, Technical Report, Air War College, USA, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  20. E. Nutley, “Non-Lethal Weapons: Setting our Phasers on Stun? Potential Strategic Blessings and Curses of Non-Lethal Weapons on the Battlefield”, Center for Strategy and Technology, Air War College, USA, August 2003.
     Google Scholar
  21. DoD Non-Lethal Capabilities: Enhancing Readiness for Crisis Response - JNLWD Annual Review 2015, USA, Available: http:// jnlwp.defense.gov/Portals/50/Documents/Press_Room/Annual_ Reviews_Reports/2015/…
     Google Scholar
  22. Defence Against Terrorism Programme of Work (DAT POW). NATO, 16 December 2015, Available: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/ topics.htm
     Google Scholar
  23. J. Spencer, and J. Carafano, “The Use of Directed-Energy Weapons to Protect Critical Infrastructure”, The Heritage Foundation, USA, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  24. J. Ellis, “Directed-Energy Weapons: Promise and Prospects”, Center for a New American Security, USA, April 2015, Available: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/190363/CNAS_Directed_Energy_Weapons_April-2015.pdf.
     Google Scholar