##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Thin airfoil theory is a simple conception of airfoils that describes angle of attack to lift for incompressible, inviscid flows. It was first devised by famous German-American mathematician Max Munk and therewithal refined by British aerodynamicist Hermann Glauertand others in the 1920s. The thin airfoil theory idealizes that the flow around an airfoil as two-dimensional flow around a thin airfoil. It can be conceived as addressing an airfoil of zero thickness and infinite wingspan. Thin airfoil theory was particularly citable in its day because it provided a well-established theoretical basis for the following important prominence of airfoils in two-dimensional flow like i) on a symmetric shape of airfoil which center of pressure and aerodynamic center remain exactly one quarter of the chord behind the leading edge, ii) on a cambered airfoil, the aerodynamic center lies exactly one quarter of the chord behind the leading edge and iii)the slope of the lift coefficient versus angle of attack line is two pi ( ) units per radian. The fundamental equation of Prandtl’s lifting-line theory; simply states that the geometric angle of attack is equal to the sum of the effective angle plus the induced angle of attack. And also omitted the theory of elliptical wing theory which indicates that the Elliptical wing has better flight performance than any other airfoil. In this experiment we made a model of elliptical wing and test in wind tunnel to get experimental value. We also analyze the model in simulation software for further knowledge. Comparing this practical and experimental value to other airfoil like Mosquito wing and NACA 64A012 airfoil for further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. http://www.codecogs.com/library/engineering/aerodynamics/basic-aerodynamics-theory.php
     Google Scholar
  2. http://web.mit.edu/16.00/www/aec/flight.html
     Google Scholar
  3. Fundamental of Aerodynamics/John D Anderson/Chapter3
     Google Scholar
  4. http://faculty.dwc.edu/.../chapter5,’Daniel Webster College’; Wing Design
     Google Scholar
  5. http://www.airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=n64012a-irfoil
     Google Scholar
  6. http://www.nasa.gov/audience/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/what-are-wind-tunnel-k4.html
     Google Scholar
  7. http://www.education.com/science-fair/article/physics_experiments-wind-tunnel/
     Google Scholar
  8. Md. Nesar Ali. Study on Bird’s & Insect’s Wing Aerodynamics and Comparison Its Analytical Value with Standard Airfoil.2017. AIP Conference Proceeding: Volume 1851,020056.
     Google Scholar
  9. Md. Nesar Ali. Study on flow over finite wing with respect to F-22 raptor, Supermarine Spitfire, F-7 BG aircraft wing and analyze its stability performance and experimental values.2017. AIP Conference Proceeding: Volume 1851,020079.
     Google Scholar
  10. Dr. Md. Mahbubul Alam. A Comparative Studies on various model Bird’s wing & standard airfoil & also track down the most effective airfoil using CFD solver software. 2017. ICMERE conference proceeding, 2017
     Google Scholar
  11. Dr. A.B.M Toufique Hasan. Study on Bird’s flapping wing aerodynamics and compared its analytical values with NACA 64A012 mod Airfoil. 2016. ICMIEE Conference proceeding 2016.
     Google Scholar
  12. Rashed Ahammad. Performance Test of NACA 2412 Airfoil. 2015. ICMERE Conference Proceeding, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  13. M.R. Amiralai. An investigation into the effects on unsteady parameters on the aerodynamics of a low Reynolds number pitching airfoil. 2010. Journal of Fluids and Structure 26 (2010), 979-993.
     Google Scholar
  14. M.A. Ashraf. Reynolds number, thickness and camber effect on flapping airfoil propulsion. 2011. Journal of Fluids and Structures 27 (2011) 145-160.
     Google Scholar
  15. Jiyu Sun. The structure and mechanical properties of dragonfly wings and their role on fly ability. 2012. Journal of Fluids and Structure 340, (2012), 3-17
     Google Scholar