##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Determining the spinning reserve capacity is amongst the most important tasks of system operator to insure safe and reliable operation of power system. So far, various methods are proposed to determine reserve capacity which are based on deterministic or probabilistic criteria. Due to considering the stochastic nature of system events, probabilistic approaches are more preferable in comparison to deterministic approaches. In practice, the value of interrupted loads are not the same for all consumers and some of them like industrial ones have higher value of lost load (VOLL). Thus, consumes with higher values of lost load are willing to pay more in order to gain higher reliability levels than consumers with less VOLL. In other words, they are more concerned with their individual load point reliability. In this paper a new method is presented to optimally determine the system spinning reserve requirement in a competitive simultaneous energy and reserve market render based on cost-benefit analysis and stochastic programming technique is proposed considering different values of lost load at each bus. Including units and lines outages and their corresponding likelihoods in the objective function, regard for loading rate of the generators constraints and transmission flow constraints are the advantages of the proposed method. Simulations performed on the 14-bus IEEE test system demonstrate effectiveness of the presented approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Afshar, K., Ehsan, M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., and Amjady, N., “Cost-benefit analysis and MILP for optimal reserve capacity determination in power system,” Appl Math Comput, pp. 223-229, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  2. Anstine, L. T., Burke, R. E., Holgate, R., Casey, J., John, R., and Stewart, H. G., “Application of probability methods to the determination of spinning reserve requirements for the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland interconnection,” IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-82, no. 68, pp. 720-735, Oct. 1963.
     Google Scholar
  3. Billinton, R. and Allan, R. N., Reliability Evaluation of Power System, ed., Plenun Press, USA, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  4. H. B. Gooi, D. P. Mendes, K. R. W. Bell, and D. S. Kirschen, “Optimal scheduling of spinning reserve, ”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1485–1492, Nov. 1999.
     Google Scholar
  5. Chattopadhyay, D., and Baldick, R., “Uint commitment with probabilistic reserve,” in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Winter Meeting, New York, vol. 1, pp. 280-285, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  6. J. Bai, H. B. Gooi, L. M. Xia, G. Strbac, and B. Venkatesh, “A probabilistic reserve market incorporating interruptible load, ”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1079–1087, Aug. 2006.
     Google Scholar
  7. L. M. Xia, H. B. Gooi, and J. Bai, “A probabilistic reserve with zero-sum settlement scheme,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 993–1000, May 2005.
     Google Scholar
  8. Y. Ding, P. Wang, and A. Lisnianski, “Optimal reserve management for restructured power generating systems,”Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, vol. 91, pp. 792–799, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  9. Billinton, R. and Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., “A basic framework for generating system operating health analysis,” IEEE Trans .Power Syst., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1610-1617, Aug. 1994.
     Google Scholar
  10. M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad and R. Billinton, “A security based approach for generating unit scheduling,” inProc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Summer Meeting, Seattle, WA, Jul. 2000, pp. 195–200.
     Google Scholar
  11. M. Fotuhi-Firoozabad and M. Rashidi-nejad, “Allocation of spinning reserve among generating units using hybrid deterministic/proba-bilistic approach,” in Proc. Large Engineering Systems Conf. Power Engineering (LESCOPE04), Halifax, NS, Canada, Jul. 2004, pp. 81–87.
     Google Scholar
  12. Abiri-Jahromi, A., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., and Abbasi, E., “Optimal Scheduling of Spinning Reserve Based on Well-Being Model,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp.2048–2057, November. 2007.
     Google Scholar
  13. Li, Z., and Shahidehpour, M., “Security-Constrained Unit Commitment for simultaneous clearing of Energy and Ancillary Services Markets,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 2, pp.1079-1088, May. 2005.
     Google Scholar
  14. M. A. Ortega-Vazquez, D. S. Kirschen, and D. Pudjianto, “Optimising the scheduling of spinning reserve considering the cost of interrup-tions,” Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng., Gen, Transm., Distrib., vol. 153, no. 5, pp. 570–575, Sep. 2006.
     Google Scholar
  15. F. Bouffard, F. D. Galiana, and A. J. Conejo, “Market-clearing with stochastic security-Part I: Formulation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1818–1826, Nov. 2005.
     Google Scholar
  16. Wang, J., Wang, X., and Wu, Y., “Operating Reserve Model in the Power Market,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp.223-229, Feb. 2005.
     Google Scholar