Quantum-behaved Particle Swarm Optimization for Power Economic Dispatch Problem of Units with Multiple Fuel Option



Abstract Views
311

Downloads
251

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Oct 12, 2017
Published Dec 16, 2017
10.24018/ejeng.2017.2.12.492

Abstract viewed = 311 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper presents a quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) with a multiple updating (MU) for solving the power economic dispatch problem (PEDP) of generators with multiple fuel options (MFOs). The QPSO assists the proposed method efficaciously find and precisely search. The MU helps the proposed method prevent deforming the augmented Lagrange function (ALF) and caused difficultly in searching optimal solution. The proposed approach combines the QPSO and the MU that has benefits of adopting a widespread area of punishment parameters and a small-size population. The proposed algorithm has been demonstrated on a practical ten generating units system; every one unit is composed of two or three fuel changes. The entire fuel price got by the proposed QPSO-MU has been competed with former studies for validating its efficacy. Compared achievements clearly express that the presented method is an effective alternative for resolving PEDP of units with MFOs in the realistic operations of power system.
Keywords: Augmented Lagrange Function Economic Dispatch MFOs Particle Swarm Optimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A. J. Wood and B. F. Wollenberg, Power Generation Operation and Control, 2nd ed, Wiley, New York, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  2. A. Chakrabarti and S. Halder, Power System Analysis Operation and Control, 3rd Edition, PHI, New Delhi, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  3. R. R. Shoults and M.M. Mead, “Optimal estimation of piece-wise linear incremental cost curves for EDC,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-103, vol. 6, pp. 1432–1438, 1984.
     Google Scholar
  4. C. E. Lin and G. L. Viviani, “Hierarchical economic dispatch for piecewise quadratic cost functions,” IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., PAS-103, no. 6, pp. 1170-1175, 1984.
     Google Scholar
  5. J. H. Park, Y. S. Kim, I. K. Eom, and K. Y. Lee, “Economic load dispatch for piecewise quadratic cost function using Hopfield neural network,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1030–1038, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  6. S. C. Lee and Y. H. Kim, “An enhanced Lagrangian neural network for the ELD problems with piecewise quadratic cost functions and nonlinear constraints,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 167–177, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  7. K. Y. Lee, A. Sode-Yome, and J. H. Park, “Adaptive Hopfield neural networks for economic load dispatch,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 519–526, May 1998.
     Google Scholar
  8. K. Y. Lee, F. M. Nuroglu, and A. Sode-Yome, “Real power optimization with load flow using adaptive Hopfield neural network,” Eng. Intell. Syst., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 53-58, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  9. N. Amjady and H. Nasiri-Rad, “Solution of nonconvex and nonsmooth economic dispatch by a new adaptive real coded genetic algorithm,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 5239–5245, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  10. C. L. Chiang and C. T. Su, “Adaptive-improved genetic algorithm for the economic dispatch of units with multiple fuel options,” Cybern. Syst.: An Internat. J., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 687–704, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  11. T. Jayabarathi, K. Jayaprakash, D. N. Jeyakumar, and T. Raghunathan, “Evolutionary programming techniques for different kinds of economic dispatch problems,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol.73, no. 2, pp. 169–176, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  12. Y. M. Park, J. R. Wong, and J. B. Park, “A new approach to economic load dispatch based on improved evolutionary programming,” Eng. Intell. Syst. Elect. Eng. Commun., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  13. N. Noman and H. Iba, “Differential evolution for economic load dispatch problems,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1322–1331, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  14. J. B. Park, K. S. Lee, and K. W. Lee, “A particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch with nonsmooth cost function,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 1, pp.34–42, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  15. W. M. Lin, F. S. Cheng, and M. T. Tsay, “Nonconvex economic dispatch by integrated artificial intelligence,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 307–311,2001.
     Google Scholar
  16. S. Baskar, P. Subbaraj, and M. V. C. Rao, “Hybrid real coded genetic algorithm solution to economic dispatch problem,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 407–419, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  17. R. Balamurugan and S. Subramanian, “Hybrid integer coded differential evolution-dynamic programming approach for economic load dispatch with multiple fuel options,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 608–614, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  18. N. J. Singh, J. S. Dhillon, D. P. Kothari, "Synergic predator-prey optimization for economic thermal power dispatch problem," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 43, pp. 298–311, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  19. K. Vaisakha and A. Srinivasa Reddy, "MSFLA/ GHS/ SFLA-GHS/ SDE algorithms for economic dispatch problem considering multiple fuels and valve point loadings," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, pp. 4281–4291, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  20. Vo Ngoc Dieu and Peter Schegner, "Augmented Lagrange Hopfield network initialized by quadratic programming for economic dispatch with piecewise quadratic cost functions and prohibited zones," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, pp. 292–301, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  21. A. K. Barisal, "Dynamic search space squeezing strategy based intelligent algorithm solutions to economic dispatch with multiple fuels," Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol.45, pp. 50–59, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  22. Vo Ngoc Dieu and W. Ongsakul, "Economic dispatch with multiple fuel types by enhanced augmented Lagrange Hopfield network," Applied Energy, vol. 91, pp. 281–289, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  23. R. Anandhakumar and S. Subramanian, "Economic Dispatch with Multiple Fuel Options Using CCF," Energy and Power Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 113-119, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  24. T. Niknam, H. D. Mojarrad, H. Z. Meymand, and B. B. Firouzi, "A new honey bee mating optimization algorithm for non-smooth economic dispatch," Energy, vol. 36, pp. 896-908, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  25. R. C. Eberhart and Y. Shi, “A modified swarm optimizer,” In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE international conference of evolutionary computation, pp. 1945–1950, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  26. J. Kennedy, and R. Eberhart, “A new optimizer using particle swarm theory,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, pp. 39-43, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  27. Y. Wang, Y. Yang, “Particle swarm with equilibrium strategy of selection for multi-objective optimization,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, issue 1, pp. 187-197, Jan. 2010.
     Google Scholar
  28. J. Chang, “A robust adaptive array beamformer using particle swarm optimization for space-time code division multiple access systems,” Inf. Sci., vol. 278, pp. 174–186, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  29. A. Ouyang, K. Li, T. K. Truong, A. Sallam, and E. H. M. Sha, “Hybrid particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation of Muskingum model,” Neural Comput. & Applic., vol. 25, issue. 7–8, pp. 1785–1799, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  30. A. Ouyang, Z. Tang, X. Zhou, Y. Xu, G. Pan, and K. Li, “Parallel hybrid PSO with CUDA for LD heat conduction equation,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 110, pp. 198–210, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  31. J. Zhao, M. Lin, D. Xu, L. Hao, and W. Zhang, “Vector control of a hybrid axial field flux-switching permanent magnet machine based on particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 51, issue11, Nov. 2015.
     Google Scholar
  32. P. Regulski, D. Vilchis-Rodriguez, S. Djurovic, and V. Terzija, “Estimation of composite load model parameters using an improved particle swarm optimization method,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 553–560, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  33. B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, M. Moradi-Dalvand and A. Rabiee, “Combined heat and power economic dispatch problem solution using particle swarm optimization with time varying acceleration coefficients,” Electric Power Syst. Res., vol. 95, pp. 9–18, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  34. F. Bergh, “An Analysis of Particle Swarm Optimizers,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Pretoria, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  35. F. Bergh, A. Engelbrecht, “A new locally convergent particle swarm optimizer,” IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern. Vol. 3, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  36. J. Sun, B. Feng, W. Xu, “Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior,” in: Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC2004, pp. 326–331, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  37. J. Sun, X. Xu, V. Palade, W. Fang, C. Lai, and W. Xu, “Convergence analysis and improvements of quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization,” Inf. Sci., vol. 193, no. 15, pp. 81–103, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  38. J. Sun, W. B. Xu, and B. Feng, “Adaptive parameter control for quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization on individual level,” In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol. 4, pp. 3049–3054, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  39. F. S. Levin, “An introduction to quantum theory,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  40. T. Liu, L. C. Jiao, W. P. Ma, and R. H. Shang, “Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization with collaborative attractors for nonlinear numerical problems,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., vol. 44, pp. 167–183, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  41. Y. Y Li, X. Bai, L. C Jiao, and Y. Xue, “Partitioned-cooperative quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization based on multilevel thresholding applied to medical image segmentation,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 56, pp. 345–356, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  42. Z. k. Feng, W. J Niu, and C. T Cheng, “Multi-objective quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization for economic environmental hydrothermal energy system scheduling,” Energy, vol. 131, pp. 165-178, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  43. T. Liu, L. C Jiao, W. P Ma, J. J Ma, and R. H Shang, “Cultural quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization for environmental/economic dispatch,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 48, pp. 597–611, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  44. W. Fang, J. Sun, H. H Chen, and X. J. Wu, “A decentralized quantum-inspired particle swarm optimization algorithm with cellular structured population,” Information Sciences, vol. 330, pp. 19–48, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  45. M. Clerc and J. Kennedy, “The particle swarm: explosion, stability and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space,” IEEE Trans Evol. Comput., vol. 6, pp.58–73, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  46. Z. Michalewicz and M. Schoenauer, “Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.1-32, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  47. M. J. D. Powell, “Algorithms for nonlinear constraints that use Lagrangian function,” Math. Programming, vol. 14, pp 224-248, 1978.
     Google Scholar
  48. C. L. Chiang, C. T. Su, and F. S. Wang, “Augmented Lagrangian method for evolutionary optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear constrained problems,” International Mathematics Journal, vol.2, no. 2, pp. 119-154, 2002.
     Google Scholar