A Comparative Study of the Fisher’s Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The relative merits of Fisher’s Discriminant Analysis (FDA) over Support Vector Machines or vice versa, will remain a bone of contention among statisticians and the machine learning community. This line of thought may be owed to the fact that FDA is due to Fishers R. A., a statistician, whereas SVM is a credit to Vanik and his team of the machine learning. In order to give a clearer picture on the strength and weakness of both classifiers, they are compared in terms of the different theories behind each one. We also look into the ways regularization is carried out by each classifier, and further examine how FDA and SVM respond to linear
transformations. We conclude with examination of the behaviour of FDA and SVM on data, given different scenarios, and in high dimensions too. In the end, we clearly draw out the differences and similarities between the two classifiers, and further highlight features that make each classifier ideal for a given classification problem.
Downloads
References
-
R. A. Fisher, “The use of Multiple Measurements in Taxonomic Problems”, Ann. Eugen., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 1936.
Google Scholar
1
-
C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-Vector Networks”, Mach. Learn., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995.
Google Scholar
2
-
Y. Li, S. Gong, and H. Liddell, “Recognising Trajectories of Facial Identities using Kernel Discriminant Analysis”, Image Vis. Comput., vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 1077–1086, 2003.
Google Scholar
3
-
Q. Liu, H. Lu, and S. Ma, “Improving Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis for Face Recognition”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp.42–49, 2004.
Google Scholar
4
-
T. Kurita and T. Taguchi, “A Modification of Kernel-Based Fisher Discriminant Analysis for Face Detection, in Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition”, Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Conference, pp. 300–305, 2002.
Google Scholar
5
-
Y. Feng and P. Shi, “Face Detection Based on Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis, in Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition”, Proceedings Sixth IEEE International Conference, pp. 381–384, 2004.
Google Scholar
6
-
L. Wei, Y. Yang, R. M. Nishikawa, and Y. Jiang, “A Study on Several Machine-Learning Methods for Classification of Malignant and Benign Clustered Microcalcifications”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 371–380, 2005.
Google Scholar
7
-
G. Baudat and F. Anouar, “Generalized Discriminant Analysis Using a Kernel Approach”, Neural Comput., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2385–2404, 2000.
Google Scholar
8
-
J. J. Liu, M. H. Bharati, K. G. Dunn, and J. F. MacGregor, “Automatic Masking in Multivariate Image Analysis using Support Vector Machines”, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 42–54, 2005.
Google Scholar
9
-
R. Burbidge, M. Trotter, B. Buxton, and S. Holden, “Drug Design by Machine Learning: Support Vector Machines for Pharmaceutical Data Analysis”, Comput Chem., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2001.
Google Scholar
10
-
U. Norinder, “Support Vector Machine Models in Drug Design: Applications to Drug Transport Processes and Qsar using Simplex Optimisations and Variable Selection”, Neurocomputing, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 337–346, 2003.
Google Scholar
11
-
L. Bao and Z. Sun, “Identifying Genes Related to Drug Anticancer Mechanisms Using Support Vector Machine”, FEBS Lett., vol. 521, no. 1–3, pp. 109–114, 2002.
Google Scholar
12
-
K. Kyoung-jae, “Financial Time Series Forecasting using Support Vector Machines”, Neurocomputing, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 307–319, 2003.
Google Scholar
13
-
U. Thissen, R. Van Brakel, A. De Weijer, W. Melssen, and L. Buydens, “Using Support Vector Machines for Time Series Prediction”, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2003.
Google Scholar
14
-
L. Xie, Y. Ying, and T. Ying, “Classification of Tomatoes with Different Genotypes by Visible and Short-Wave Near-Infrared Spectroscopy with Least-Squares Support Vector Machines and other Chemometrics”, J. Food Eng., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2009.
Google Scholar
15
-
N. Gilardi, M. Kanevski, M. Maignan, and E. Mayoraz, “Environmental and Pollution Spatial Data Classification with Support Vector Machines and Geostatistics”, Greece ACAI, vol. 99, pp. 43–51, 1999.
Google Scholar
16
-
M. Kanevski, M. Maignan, and A. Pozdnukhov, “Active Learning of Environmental Data Using Support Vector Machines”, Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 2005.
Google Scholar
17
-
I. Gokcen and J. Peng, “Comparing Linear Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines”, International Conference on Advances in Information Systems, 2002, pp. 104–113.
Google Scholar
18
-
M. Khondoker, R. Dobson, C. Skirrow, A. Simmons, and D. Stahl, “A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Classification using Simulation with Multiple Real Data Examples from Mental Health Studies”, Stat. Methods Med. Res., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1804–1823, 2016.
Google Scholar
19
-
[20] C. W. Hsu, C. C. Chang, C. J. Lin, and others, “A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification”, Taipe, Taiwan, 2003.
Google Scholar
20
-
Wikipedia, “Discriminant Function Analysis” — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2016.
Google Scholar
21
-
J. H. Friedman, “Regularized Discriminant Analysis”, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 84, no. 405, pp. 165–175, 1989.
Google Scholar
22
-
D. M. Witten and R. Tibshirani, “Penalized Classification using Fisher’s Linear Discriminant”, J.R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 753–772, 2011.
Google Scholar
23
-
P. J. Bickel and E. Levina, “Some Theory for Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Function,Naive Bayes, and Some Alternatives When There Are Many More Variables than Observations”, Bernoulli, pp. 989–1010, 2004.
Google Scholar
24
-
J. Taylor, “Data Mining”, http://statweb.stanford.edu/~jtaylo/courses/stats20/restricted/notes/outlier.pdf, Dec-2012.
Google Scholar
25
-
H. Schütze, “An Introduction to Information Retrieval”. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2009
Google Scholar
26