##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Activated carbons are carbonaceous materials characterized by their large internal surface area, well-developed porous structure, and tunable surface-containing functional groups. Adsorption onto activated carbon has been found to be one of the most widely used methods for removing organic and inorganic contaminants from water due to its high adsorption capacity. Activated carbon has been synthesized from bio-waste materials of the plant Bambusa vulgaris. Physical activation was done by a thermal treatment which was followed by chemical activation using HNO3 and H3PO4 respectively. This is done in order to allow contaminants to be adsorbed on the surface area which depends upon the functional group and ions present on the surface of the activated carbon. Characterization includes pH, apparent density, Boehm titration, iodine number, proximate analysis, SEM studies, and FTIR studies. The synthesized adsorbent acts effectively thus proving that this activated carbon can be considered a good adsorbent for the removal of impurities from water.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bansal R.C., and Goyal M. Activated Carbon Adsorption. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press, USA; 2005.
     Google Scholar
  2. Harry Marsh and Franciso Rodriguez-Reinoso. Activated Carbon. Elsevier Science & Technology Books; 2006.
     Google Scholar
  3. Cheremisinoff and Ellerbusch F. Carbon Adsorption Handbook. Michigan: Ann Arbor Science;1978.
     Google Scholar
  4. Berl E. Formation and Properties of Activated Carbon. 1st ed. Royal Society of Chemistry, United State of America; 1938.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bandosz Teresa J. Activated carbon surfaces in environmental remediation. volume-7 interface science and technology (Elsevier), the city college of New York, USA; 2006.
     Google Scholar
  6. Radhika M., and Palanivelu K. Adsorptive removal of chlorphenols from aqueous solution by low cost adsorbent – Kinetics and isotherm analysis, Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2006;138 (B):116–124.
     Google Scholar
  7. Onal Y., Akmil-Basar C., Sarici-Ozdemir C., and Erdogan S. Textural development of sugar beet bagasse activated with ZnCl2, Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;142:138–143.
     Google Scholar
  8. Wang S.L., Tzou Y.M., Lu Y.H., and Sheng G. Removal of 3- chlorophenol from water using rice-straw-based carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;147:313–318.
     Google Scholar
  9. Hameed B.H., Din A.T.M., and Ahmad A.L. Adsorption of methylene blue onto bamboo-based activated carbon: Kinetics and equilibrium studies. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007; 141:819–825.
     Google Scholar
  10. Hameed B.H., Ahmad A.L., and Latiff. K.N.A. Adsorption of basic dye (methylene blue) onto activated carbon prepared from rattan sawdust. Dyes and Pigments.2007; 75:143–149.
     Google Scholar
  11. Legrouri K., Khouya E., Ezzine M., Hannache H., Denoyel R., Pallier R., and Naslain R. Production of activated carbon from a new precursor molasses by activation with sulphuric acid. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2005; 118 (B): 259–263.
     Google Scholar
  12. Prakash Kumar B.G., Shivakamy K., Lima Rose M. and Velan M. Preparation of steam activated carbon from rubberwood sawdust (Hevea brasiliensis) and its adsorption kinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2006; B136 (2): 922– 929.
     Google Scholar
  13. Tan I.A.W., Hameed B.H., and Ahmad A.L. Equilibrium and kinetic studies on basic dye adsorption by oil palm fibre activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2007;127:111–119.
     Google Scholar
  14. Basar C.A. Applicability of the various adsorption models of three dyes adsorption onto activated carbon prepared waste apricot. Journal of Hazardous. Materials. 2006; B135:232–241.
     Google Scholar
  15. Tan I.A.W., Hameed B.H., and Ahmad A.L. Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbons from coconut husk using response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2008;137:462–470.
     Google Scholar
  16. Rao N., Ramanatha Rao V., and Dransfield J. Priority species of bamboo and rattan. Bioversity International, 1998:25.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ohrnberger D. The bamboos of the world, Elsevier, University of California, Biology Pamphlets. 199;741:15.
     Google Scholar
  18. Louppe D., Oteng-Amoako A.A., and Brink M. Timbers. PROTA. 2008;1:100-103.
     Google Scholar
  19. Flora of North America Editorial Committee, Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae, Oxford University Press, page 22;2007.
     Google Scholar
  20. Rao A. N., Ramanatha Rao V. and Dransfield J. Priority species of bamboo and rattan, Bioversity international, 1998: 25.
     Google Scholar
  21. Ted Jordan Meredith. Timber Press pocket guide to bamboos. Timber Press, 2009:49.
     Google Scholar
  22. Bambusa vulgaris. Flora of China, eFloras.com. 2000.
     Google Scholar
  23. Najma Dharani. Field guide to common trees & shrubs of East Africa, Struik, 2002:198.
     Google Scholar
  24. Annual Book of ASTM Standard, Standard test for pH of Activated Carbon, ASTM D 3838-05, Philadelphia PA, United State of America; 2011.
     Google Scholar
  25. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Standard Test Method for Apparent Density of Activated Carbon D 2854-96, Philadelphia PA, United State of America;1999.
     Google Scholar
  26. Test methods of activated carbon, European council for chemical manufacturers federations, EFIC press;1986.
     Google Scholar
  27. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Standard Test Method for water soluble of Activated Carbon D 5029-98, Philadelphia PA, United State of America;2009.
     Google Scholar
  28. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Standard Test Method for determination of Iodine Number of Activated Carbon D4607 – 94, Philadelphia PA, United State of America,755-759;2006.
     Google Scholar
  29. Boehm H. Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons, Carbon. 1995;32-5:759-769.
     Google Scholar
  30. Boehm H. Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: a critical assessment, Carbon. 2002;40 – 2:145-149.
     Google Scholar
  31. Kosmulski M. The pH dependent Surface Charging and the Points of Zero Charge, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2002; 253:77-87.
     Google Scholar
  32. Kosmulski M. pH-dependent surface charging and points of zero charge, IV. Update and new approach, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.2009; 337:439–448.
     Google Scholar
  33. Annual Book of ASTM Standards,Standard Test Method for Moisture in Activated Carbon D2867-95, Philadelphia PA. United State of America ,709-711;2004.
     Google Scholar
  34. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter Content of Activated Carbon Samples D5832-95, Philadelphia PA. United State of America, 921-922;2003.
     Google Scholar
  35. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Standard Test Method for Total Ash Content of Activated Carbon D2866-94, Philadelphia PA, United State of America, 707-708;1999.
     Google Scholar
  36. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Standard Test Method for Total Ash Content of Activated Carbon D2866-94, Philadelphia PA, United State of America, 707-708;1999.
     Google Scholar
  37. Somasekhara Rao K., Prasad N.V.V.S., Ram Babu C., Kishore M., Ravi M., and Krishna Vani K. Preparation and Characterization of low cost adsorbent carbons. Chem. Environ. Res. 2005; 14(1&2):29-135.
     Google Scholar
  38. Tomlinson J.B., Freeman J.J, Sing K.S.W., and Theocaris C.R. Rates of activation and scanning electron microscopy of polyaryllamide-derived chars. Carbon. 1995;33(6):789-793.
     Google Scholar
  39. Yan R., Chin T., Ng Y.L., Duan H., Liang D.T., and Tay J.H. Influence of surface properties on the mechanism of H2S removal by alkaline activated carbons, Environmental science and technology. 2004; 38:316-323.
     Google Scholar
  40. Yang R.T. Adsorbents Fundamentals and Applications,New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2003.
     Google Scholar
  41. Barrett E.P., Joyner L.G. and Halenda P.P. The determination of pore volume and area distribution in porous substances. I.Computation from nitrogen isotherms. Journal of American Chemical Society. 1951;73:373–380.
     Google Scholar
  42. Cao Q., Xie K.C., Lv Y.K. and Bao W.R. Process effects on activated carbon with large specific surface area from corn cob. Bioresource Technology. 2006;97:110–115.
     Google Scholar
  43. Gregg S.J. and Sing K.S.W. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity, Academic Press, London and New York, pp.371;1982.
     Google Scholar
  44. Coates J. Interpretation of Infrared Spectra, A Practical Approach encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, R.A. Meyers (Ed.) Ó John Wiley & sons Ltd, Chichester,10815–10837;2000.
     Google Scholar
  45. Lambert J.B., et al. Introduction to organic spectroscopy. Macmillan publication, New York ;1987.
     Google Scholar
  46. Socrates G. Infrared Characteristic Group Frequencies. New York, John wiley ;1994.
     Google Scholar
  47. Fanning P.E., and Vannice M.A. A drifts study of the formation of surface groups on carbon by oxidation, Carbon. 1993;31:721-30.
     Google Scholar
  48. Zawadzki J. Infrared spectroscopy in surface chemistry of carbons, In: thrower PA, editor, chemistry and physics of carbon. 1989;21:147-380.
     Google Scholar
  49. Painter P., Starsinic M., and Coleman M., Determination of functional groups in coal by fourier transform interferometry. In: Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy.1985;4:169-189.
     Google Scholar