Comparison of the Thermal and Electrical Conductivities of Pretreated Kenaf–Polyester Composites
Article Main Content
Conductivity of a material is an important physical property that determines its suitability or otherwise in all engineering designs and construction. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of two pretreatment methods viz acetylation and permanganate on the thermal and electrical conductivities of pretreated kenaf bast fibres applied in polyester resin. Fully grown kenaf (hibiscus cannabalis) were manually retted from the stalk, washed, and cut into short fibre lengths of about 10 cm. One portion of the fibres was pretreated with 5%pbw NaOH solution before immersing it in glacial acetic acid and then in acetic anhydride. The second was also pretreated with5%pbw of NaOH before being pretreated with 0.125%of KMnO4. The third portion of fibres was untreated to serve as control. The ground fibre was incorporated into ortho unsaturated polyester rand cast with moulds of dumb-belland square shapes. The electrical conductivity of the composites was deduced by measuring the resistance of the composites using the high voltage insulation tester model 3122 and calculating from equations. The thermal conductivities were determined by analytical method. The results show that chemical pretreatments of fibres by acetylation and permanganate methods have no appreciable effect on the thermal conductivities of composites. Further findings show that the acetylated fibre composites have no effect on the electrical conductivities of the composites. The permanganate pretreated fibre composites however increased the electrical conductivities of the composites significantly.
References
-
M. Thirudutrambalam, A. Alavudeen, “Improving Mechanical Properties of Banana / Kenaf Polyester Hybrid Composites Using Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Treatments,” Journal of Material Physics and Mechanics, vol. 8 p. 165–17, 2009.
Google Scholar
1
-
J. C.Bart, Additives in Polymers, Industrial Analysis and Applications, John Wiley, England. p. 14, 2005.
Google Scholar
2
-
M. Abdelmouleh, S. Bonfi, A. BenSalah, M. N. Belgacem, A. Gandini, “Modification of cellulose fibres with functionalized silane: effect of fibre treatment on the performance of cellulose – thermoset composites,” J. Applied Polymer Science, vol. 98, pp. 974-984, 2005.
Google Scholar
3
-
M. S. Sreekala, M. D. Kumaran, G. Joseph, M. Jacob, S. Thomas, “Oil palm fibre phenol formaldehyde composites: Influence of fibre surface modification on the mechanical performance,” Applied materials Composites, vol. 7 p. 295, 2000.
Google Scholar
4
-
S. Mohanty, S. K. Nayak, S. K. Verma, J. S. Tripathy, “Influence of fibre treatment on the performance of sisal-polypropylene composites,” J. Reinforced Plastic Composite, vol. 23, pp. 625, 2005.
Google Scholar
5
-
S. Mishra, J. B. Naik, Y. P. Patil, “Reinforced Novalac Composites,” Composite Science Technology, vol. 60, p. 1729, 2000.
Google Scholar
6
-
K. Joseph, L. H. C. Mattoso, R. D. Toledo, S. Thomas, “Natural Fibre Reinforced Composites,” in Natural Polymers and Agrofibre Composites. E. Frorolini, A. L. Leao and L. H. C Matloso Eds, Sam Carlos Brazil Embrays US – IQSC UNESP pp. 159, 2000.
Google Scholar
7
-
A. Paul, K. Joseph, S. Thomas, “Effect of surface treatments on the electrical properties of low density polyethylene composites reinforced with short sisal fibre,” Composite Science and Technology, vol. 57, pp. 67–79, 1997.
Google Scholar
8
-
K. C. M. Nair, S. Thomas, G. Groeninckx, “Mechanical properties of sisal fiber reinforced urea – formaldehyde,” Composite Science Technology, vol. 61, pp. 2519, 2001.
Google Scholar
9