Biogas Production in Laboratory Scale from Different Organic Wastes Using Primary Sludge as Co-substrate


  •   Holta Prifti

  •   Tania Floqi


Biogas production technology not only constitutes a biofuel source, but also can be a mitigation measure for the various environmental pollutants. This technology, i.e., anaerobic digestion is a biological process that takes place naturally when microorganisms break down organic matter in the absence of oxygen. In an enclosed chamber, controlled anaerobic digestion of organic matter produces biogas which is predominantly methane. The produced methane then can be directly used; or after certain conditioning, can be used in onsite power generation, heating homes or as vehicular fuel. Besides, organic waste is increasingly becoming a major problem in every society imposing serious economic and environmental concerns. For this reason, many contemporary researches are emphasizing in finding sustainable solutions to recycle and produce energy from such waste. In this context, this paper aims to investigate the potential of cow and chicken manure, and olive waste for biogas production obtained through the anaerobic digestion process.

The substrates were placed in laboratory scale digesters without pretreatment. The retention time in the digesters was 30 days. The samples of the tested substrates were collected and analyzed for pH, total solids, ash, and the content of volatile solids (VS). Under mesophilic conditions, all combinations of cow and chicken manure, and olive waste with sludge by an anaerobic pond of a trickling filter treatment plant, as co-substrate, significantly improved biogas, and methane yields. The experimental results showed that chicken manure (CM) is the most suitable for anaerobic digestion (AD).

The next step of the study will consist in implementing a large scale of biogas production plants and we will estimate the national potential of green energy produced by this technology and map the areas that need digesters.

Keywords: anaerobic digestion, biogas, co-substrate, methane


IEA Bioenergy, Sustainable biogas production in municipal wastewater treatment plants, ISBN 978-1-910154-22-9, 2015. 19 pages.

Martin Wittmaier –Institut für Energie und Kreislaufwirtschaft an der Hochschule Bremen GmbH – Fermentation of waste and organic substrates from agriculture – technical possibilities and potential for the production of generative energy. Germany 2010. 30 pages.

Teodorita Al Seadi, Dominik Rutz, Heinz Prassl, Michael Köttner, Tobias Finsterwalder, Silke Volk, Rainer Janssen. Biogas handbook. Denmark 2008.

Stanley E. Manahan Green Chemistry and the Ten Commandments of Sustainability, Chem Char research, Inc. 2005.

Gracia Silvestre Tormo, Sewage Sludge Anaerobic Digestion –Study of synergies and operational strategies of co-digestion, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona 2015. Pages 39-41.

Mirel Mico, Tania Floqi, Oltion Marko, Ana Tomorri, Rodon Miraj, Some data on biogas production in laboratory scale from different albanian substrates, 2nd International Conference - Research and Education in Natural Sciences, Proceedings book Volume 2, BENA, Shkodёr Albania 2013. Pages 107-113.

Organizational set up for an effective organic waste management system for energy profit, ‘Sustainable landscape and planning and safe environment’, BENA Istanbul Conference, Istanbul Turkey, 2012.

Waste Framework Directive, Directive 2008/98/EC.

ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems.

ISO 14031:2013 Environmental Performance Evaluation.

Directive 2008/98 EC “On waste” (19.11.2008) E.U Regulation No. 1179/2012.

Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 “On the Landfill of Waste”.

Directive 2000/76/EC “On Incineration of Waste” (04.12.2000).

National Strategy on Integrated Waste Management (2018-2030).


Download data is not yet available.


How to Cite
Prifti, H. and Floqi, T. 2021. Biogas Production in Laboratory Scale from Different Organic Wastes Using Primary Sludge as Co-substrate. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research. 6, 3 (Apr. 2021), 109–111. DOI: