##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The use of separated flow models to specify the vertical lift performance of an oil well is usually somewhat complex- due to the many equations and correlations involved in the determination of the required variables. Consequently, coding these models in the computer presents an extent of difficulty. In this study however, with the view of developing a computer model (DOBB) to perform nodal analysis for oil wells, an efficient algorithm was established to facilitate the determination of the operating pressure and liquid flow rate of oil wells (which is the point of intersection between the VLP and IPR curve). More so, Hagedorn Brown model was incorporated into the computer model to account for liquid hold ups and various flow regimes (excluding bubble flow regime) in the tubing string. The computer model developed in this study is equipped with the ability to determine fanning friction factor of the tubing string provided that the roughness of the pipe is known.  Also, when the developed computer model was tested with some ranges of data points, nodal analysis plots were obtained from the different data points. Nonetheless, DOBB (a production engineering toolkit developed in this study) was proven to be efficient on the part of performing nodal analysis for oil wells.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A. Ansari, S. Sylvester, C. Sarica, O. Shoham, and J. Brill, “A Comprehensive Mechanistic Model for upward Two-Phase Flow in Wellbore”. SPE Production and Facilities. AIME. May 1994.
     Google Scholar
  2. H. Bandakhlia, and K. Aziz, “Inflow Performance Relationship for Solution gas drive horizontal wells”, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, Texas, 1989
     Google Scholar
  3. K. Brown, “The Technology of Artificial Lift Methods” (Vol. 1). Tulsa, OK: PentWell Books. 1977.
     Google Scholar
  4. A. Cicchitti, “Two Phase Cooling Experiments - Pressure drop, heat transfer and burnout measurements”, Energia Nucleare, 7(6), 407, 1960.
     Google Scholar
  5. A. Dukler, M. Wicks, and R. Cleveland, “Frictional pressure drop in two phase flow: A comparison of existing correlations for pressure loss and hold-up”, AICHE, 38-42, 1964.
     Google Scholar
  6. H., Duns, and N. ROS, “Vertical flow of gas and liquid mixtures in wells” World Petroleum Congress, 1963
     Google Scholar
  7. M. J. Economedes, D. Hills, and C. Ehlig-Economedees, “Petroleum Production Systems”. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall Engineering Series, 1994.
     Google Scholar
  8. M. Fetkovich, “The isochronal testing of oil wells” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1973.
     Google Scholar
  9. G. Goier, and K. Aziz, “The flow of Complex Mixtures in Pipes”, Huntington, New York: Robert E. Drieger Publishing Co. 1997
     Google Scholar
  10. G. Gregory and M. Fogarasi, “Alternate to standard friction factor equation”, Oil Gas Journal, 120-127. 1985.
     Google Scholar
  11. P. Griffith and G. Wallis, “Two-Phase Slug Flow”, Trans,ASME, 83, 307-315, 1961.
     Google Scholar
  12. B. Guo, and A. Ghalambor, “Gas Volume Requirements for Underbalanced Drilling Deviated Holes” Tulsa: PennWell Corporation, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  13. B. Guo, W. C. Lyons and A. Ghalambor, “Petroleum Production Engineering, Elsevier Science and Technology Books, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  14. Oxford Dictionaries. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/comuter_model
     Google Scholar
  15. E. Petroulsos, “Mastering Visual Basic.Net”, San Francisco, London: SYBEX, Inc. Alameda. Retrieved from www.sybex.com. 2002
     Google Scholar
  16. F. Poettmann, and P. Carpenter, “Multiphase Flow of gas, oil and water through vertical flow strings with Application to Design lift Installations”, Drilling and Production Practice, pp. 257-317, 1952.
     Google Scholar